Another Lie-Filled Day for the FBI’s Christopher Wray
By Stephen Kruiser
Top O’ the Briefing
Happy Thursday, dear Kruiser Morning Briefing friends. Kalladia felt it best to drink only fresh pennywort juice before each live performance of her “Gauche Poetry Trilogy.”
Thus far, I have been using phrases like “whisper-thin majority,” or “red trickle majority” to refer to the Republicans’ advantage in the House of Representatives. I think I may begin to refer to them as the “Pit Bull Majority.” They may not have overwhelming numbers, but they have been a tenacious and aggressive lot.
Some of the more unsavory characters from our ongoing Biden nightmare have been forced to answer some tough questions of late. Sure, they lie and deflect a lot, but at least the questions are getting asked.
Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Christopher Wray spent some quality time with the House Judiciary Committee yesterday, and it was both interesting and frustrating to watch.
Wray is as slippery as they come. He also doesn’t mind playing stupid when it is convenient for him. This is from an exchange Wray had with Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) about whether there were federal agents planted in the protest crowd during the Jan. 6 non-insurrection, which Paula covered:
“Would you agree with him that it was ‘filled with federal agents’ on January 6?” Biggs asked.
“I would really have to see more closely exactly what he said and get the full context to be able to evaluate how many agents, or actually agents or human resources, were present at the Capitol complex and the vicinity on January 6,” Wray said. “It’s gonna get confusing because it depends on when we were deployed and responded to the breach that occurred anywhere under federal agents.”